Input operations— These include the read, readv, recv, recvfrom, and recvmsg functions. If we call one of these input functions for a blocking TCP socket (the default), and there is no data available in the socket receive buffer, we are put to sleep until some data arrives. Since TCP is a byte stream, we will be awakened when "some" data arrives: It could be a single byte of data, or it could be a full TCP segment of data. If we want to wait until some fixed amount of data is available, we can call our own function readn (Figure 3.15) or specify the MSG_WAITALL flag (Figure 14.6).

Since UDP is a datagram protocol, if the socket receive buffer is empty for a blocking UDP socket, we are put to sleep until a UDP datagram arrives.

With a nonblocking socket, if the input operation cannot be satisfied (at least one byte of data for a TCP socket or a complete datagram for a UDP socket), we see an immediate return with an error of EWOULDBLOCK.

Output operations— These include the write, writev, send, sendto, and sendmsg functions. For a TCP socket, we said in Section 2.11 that the kernel copies data from the application's buffer into the socket send buffer. If there is no room in the socket send buffer for a blocking socket, the process is put to sleep until there is room.

With a nonblocking TCP socket, if there is no room at all in the socket send buffer, we return immediately with an error of EWOULDBLOCK. If there is some room in the socket send buffer, the return value will be the number of bytes the kernel was able to copy into the buffer. (This is called a short count.)

We also said in Section 2.11 that there is no actual UDP socket send buffer. The kernel just copies the application data and moves it down the stack, prepending the UDP and IP headers. Therefore, an output operation on a blocking UDP socket (the default) will not block for the same reason as a TCP socket, but it is possible for output operations to block on some systems due to the buffering and flow control that happens within the networking code in the kernel.

Accepting incoming connections— This is the accept function. If accept is called for a blocking socket and a new connection is not available, the process is put to sleep.

If accept is called for a nonblocking socket and a new connection is not available, the error EWOULDBLOCK is returned instead.

Initiating outgoing connections— This is the connect function for TCP. (Recall that connect can be used with UDP, but it does not cause a "real" connection to be established; it just causes the kernel to store the peer's IP address and port number.) We showed in Section 2.6 that the establishment of a TCP connection involves a three-way handshake and the connect function does not return until the client receives the ACK of its SYN. This means that a TCP connect always blocks the calling process for at least the RTT to the server.

If connect is called for a nonblocking TCP socket and the connection cannot be established immediately, the connection establishment is initiated (e.g., the first packet of TCP's three-way handshake is sent), but the error EINPROGRESS is returned. Notice that this error differs from the error returned in the previous three scenarios. Also notice that some connections can be established immediately, normally when the server is on the same host as the client. So, even with a nonblocking connect, we must be prepared for connect to return successfully. We will show an example of a nonblocking connect in Section 16.3.

Traditionally, System V has returned the error EAGAIN for a nonblocking I/O operation that cannot be satisfied, while Berkeley-derived implementations have returned the error EWOULDBLOCK. Because of this history, the POSIX specification says either may be returned for this case. Fortunately, most current systems define these two error codes to be the same (check your system's <sys/errno.h> header), so it doesn't matter which one we use. In this text, we use EWOULDBLOCK.